yourlocalforeign:

kimreesesdaughter:

kimreesesdaughter:

purplechocolatekisses:

kimreesesdaughter:

I just left a plantation tour in Louisiana. I have a lot to say…

SAY IT!

I honestly thought I knew everything about slavery. Not so.

The owner of this particular plantation had it built by slaves for 3 years. Every brick was handmade. Over 120,000 bricks on 2,000+ acres of land (this place was huge.) The clay used for the bricks came from the Mississippi River. The majority of the slaves are buried under the Levees and water. Some are buried with their Masters. Not allowed to live with them but could be dead with them.

Before you enter the house, there’s a list of slaves who lived here including their age and how much they were purchased for. 124 total. Some slaves were worth as little as $25. As young as 5 years old.

On this particular plantation, the owner was big on punishment…he used noise making neck restraints. Imagine three 4lb balls around your neck with bells inside. Children were restrained by ankle locks that connected between their ankles.

This was a sugar cane plantation, one the worst practices to involve slaves because of its danger. A lot of slaves were decapitated, amputees and killed from the fields and machinery. A lot of kids lost their lives creating sugar. Speaking of children, a child stood in the living room and operated the fan with a string while guests ate dinner. As young as 3 years old.

Here’s what shook me even further: Before the Civil War, a lot of slave owners were going in debt and could not afford their properties and were not producing enough cotton and sugar to maintain their lifestyles. Slaves were used as HUMAN CREDIT CARDS. Slaves were a guaranteed line of credit. You could get HALF of your property’s value depending on how many healthy and able slaves you owned.

My people were human credit cards and lines of credit to BANKS. We were property. We were labeled as equipment and nothing more.

There is no such thing as a good slave owner. They owned my PEOPLE and used them as checks and balances. This cycle continues with prison and brutality. I do not want to hear shit about “Why can only Black people say this or that?” I don’t want to hear shit about “we’re all human.”

And by the way, not one of those slaves are at rest. Those spirits were so alive, you could feel their presence, their pain and someday, their revenge.

The front of the house and yard. This plantation was huge. Just thinking about my ancestors tending to all this land…

image
image

SOME of the enslaved names, ages, race and purchase price.

image

The living room.

image

Interior.

image

The dining room. That piece hanging above the table is ORIGINAL to the house. That’s the fan that a slave as young as 3 years old had to operate manually with a string.

image

The view from the balcony in the main hallway. This is how they looked over the slaves while they worked in the yard.

image

*sigh* Names of the enslaved that occupied the shacks. Children included. Their names are written inside one of the shacks. I’m not sure if there are other names inside other shacks because I could only handle 2. After I saw the punishment equipment, I left.

image

Slave Shacks. These are NOT the original shacks. These were built to imitate them.

image

Slaves for Sale Ads.

image
image
image

The landscape of Slavery throughout the United States in 1860. JUST 1860. Let that sink in.

image

Note: The last time the home was OWNED by a Louisiana citizen was 1972. This is her original bedroom, her lipstick is STILL on the dresser. This is why the house has been updated since slavery times because it was occupied up until 1972. Regardless, this used to be where house slaves slept.

image

This really fuckin happened, don’t let white people tell you that it’s in the past & to let it go.

What do you think of the Duchess of Sussex’s new cost of arms? Does this need to wait for a Wednesday?

goodqueenaly:

For those who don’t know, this is the coat of arms created for the new Duchess of Sussex:

image

All in all, these arms are very nice, and quite fitting to Meghan Markle (indeed, the Garter King of Arms – a fantastic title, indicating effectively the senior officer in charge of the royal heraldry of England, Wales, and Northern Ireland – stated that “[t]he Duchess of Sussex took a great interest in the design”). The design has quite a few nods to California, her home state: the blue field represents the  Pacific Ocean, the gold bendlets on the field represent rays of sunshine, and at the bottom you can see blooms of the golden poppy, the state flower of California. The wintersweet plants next to the golden poppies are a sweet reminder of their Kensington Palace home, Nottingham Cottage, which has wintersweet growing in front of it. As an indication of her past writing, communication skills, and outreach work, the coat of arms also features three quills and a songbird as a supporter. 

The one interesting aspect of her coat of arms is that it has been impaled – that is, placed side by side – with Harry’s (on the left, above – you can see the lions of England and Scotland and the harp of Ireland, as well as the seashells in honor of his mother’s Spencer family and the five points indicating that he is a grandson of the reigning sovereign). As I gather (though I’m far from an expert), this is atypical in a case like the Duchess of Sussex’s, where she holds these arms in her own right (rather than through her father), and instead an inescutcheon – that is, a shield with her arms placed within a shield of his arms – would have been more expected. I don’t know what the reasoning was here, but I suppose that if anyone knows what he’s doing when it comes to how arms should be presented, it would be the Garter King of Arms.

adhdperalta:

thegayastrologist:

homoboyfriend:

Can we talk about this?!

HEY remember in WWII when Jewish people were fleeing Germany and the USA put a quota on how many Jewish immigrants they would accept because they were worried there were too many Jewish people coming over to the USA???

Reminder that the USA has always been fucking garbage to immigrants and basic humanity

Here’s how you can help:

Please reblog this. There’s a lot of arguing in the reblogs/replies, but no links to actual concrete ways to become of help to these people. 

rejectedprincesses:

immoralq:

greencarnations:

spacethefinalfuck:

mehhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh:

Female BAMFs Throughout History

this is fab BUT WHERE ARE THEIR NAMES?

I’m always wanting to read more about these posts immediately and I have trouble finding the sources.

@greencarnations

I remember @rejectedprincesses doing an entry on Lyudmila Pavlichenko, so there’s a place to start.

Website:  Rejected Princesses

I’ve actually covered nearly all of them:

Nancy Wake is on my list to cover, but her story is too cool to be able to do in one entry. I’m not kidding when I think she needs a full graphic novel to do justice by her story.

dessa-lux:

“To put it yet another way, in my country where Dukes are actually a thing, there are a grand total of 30 (6 members of the Royal family, 24 others), and while the amount of Duchies in the Kingdom has varied a bit over the years, this number has remained relatively stable.  By contrast, although I don’t have access to hard census data for the 19thcentury, Google reliably informs me that there were 2,651,939 people in London in 1851. And, if we take the extremely conservative estimate that only 0.1% of them were people of colour, that means that in the mid-19th century there were 2650 POCs in London compared to about 30 Dukes in the whole country. So, from a certain perspective, a historical romance about a person of colour set in England in the mid-19th century is 88.3 times more plausible than one about a Duke. But because we’re used to seeing stories about Dukes in the 19th century and we aren’t used to seeing stories about people who aren’t white or heterosexual in the 19th century,  stories about the absolutely tiny number of high ranking members of the landed aristocracy seem natural and normal to us while stories about the proportionally much larger number of marginalised people living in England at the time feel implausible or disorientating, even though they’re actually more reflective of the lives of real people.”

-Alexis Hall, Obligatory RITA post (with added musing about the historical category)

my students react to roman emperors

thoodleoo:

  • “so is murdering all of your relatives just, like…a thing if you’re emperor”
  • (upon hearing about hadrian and antinous) “WHAT. i want a boyfriend to make a cult for me and order a million statues of me when i’m dead!!”
  • “can i ask a question? why is nero Like That?”
  • “i wouldn’t want to be a roman emperor because i like my life, i enjoy living,”
  • “so are all roman emperors basically gay?”
  • (when i told them that caligula was called little boots because of a tiny soldier’s uniform he wore as a child) “awww how cute!!”
  • (when i told them that caligula grew up to be…well, caligula) “aWWW LESS CUTE”
  • (while researching the emperor their group was assigned) “how did our guy die? oh, assassination, big surprise”
  • “oh, he boiled his wife and son alive! what a family man”
  • (upon hearing some of the frivolous and/or authoritarian laws some emperors supposedly instituted) “gee, that sounds familiar…”
  • (while reading aloud their group’s presentation on hadrian) “and i love to spend time working on my wall- make rome great again, y’all”

Jewish Groups File Brief With Supreme Court Against Trump Travel Ban

littlegoythings:

At least six Jewish civil rights organizations have filed a joint amicus brief with the Supreme Court asking it to uphold lower court rulings that have blocked President Trump’s most recent ban on travel from a number of predominately Muslim countries.

The brief, spearheaded by the Anti-Defamation League, was filed Friday, according to a statement from the ADL. It was joined by the Jewish Council for Public Affairs, an umbrella body for Jewish public policy groups; three Reform movement groups, the Union for Reform Judaism, the Central Conference of American Rabbis and Women of Reform Judaism; and T’ruah, a rabbinical human rights group.

Jewish Groups File Brief With Supreme Court Against Trump Travel Ban

momnar:

splend-42:

asymbina:

milenab:

asymbina:

cracktheglasses:

bunjywunjy:

magnolia-noire:

birchsoda:

yesterdaysprint:

arctic-hands:

thefingerfuckingfemalefury:

my-little-yellowbird:

jmesflint:

Horrible Histories S01E03
 Slimy Stuarts: Wife swap with the Miserables, a Puritan family, and the Merrys, a Restoration family

~ History ~

Some names such as Joy, Hope, and Mercy are still used today
but others such as Silence, Discipline, and ‘If Christ had not died for
thee, thou hadst been damned’ were real. Here is a list of more Puritan
names

Tag yourself. I’m “Has-Descendents.”

History is one thousand times more utterly ridiculous than you might think O.O

Faint-not, perfect for the one with syncope

The Canton Independent-Sentinel, Pennsylvania, September 10, 1880

The Daily Commonwealth, Topeka, Kansas, June 6, 1883

image

The Minneapolis Journal, Minnesota, January 2, 1905

image

Daily Capital Journal, Salem, Oregon, April 4, 1916

image

Bernardsville News, New Jersey, July 14, 1938

image

The Age, Melbourne, Australia, May 3, 1941

image

Just imagine screaming those at the playground to get your kids!

“FEAR-GOD GET YOUR ASS IN THE HOUSE THE STREETLIGHTS ARE ON! AND GET YOUR BROTHER HELP AND TELL THANKS TO BRING HER ASS HOME!”

okay but Damned Barebones is the most metal name I’ve ever heard

@gentleman-caller

They’re called hortatory names (same root as “exhortation”). And, yes, they really existed.

History is so much fun.

I used to think history was dry and dusty.

Now, the more I learn about history, the more I realize it was utterly and completely bananas.

A friend of mine chose his 17th Century re-enactment name as The Lord Giveth and The Lord Taketh Away Smith.

The Puritans had Tiefling Names